By Herve Ryssen

Translated from french by John de Nugent

Judaism is not merely a 1religion,4 as many Jews are overt atheists or
agnostics, and they do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that. Jewry is
also not a race even if it is true that a 1trained eye,4 most of the time, can
recognize a Jewish appearance, that is to say, a characteristic pattern which is
the result of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries. Jews see
themselves as the 1chosen ones4 of God, and marriage outside the community
is strictly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also
helped to renew the blood of Israel during all the centuries spent in the various
ghettos where the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of
the population. The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the
mother be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child
born of a Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent
can suffice for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is
therefore a 1mental race4 that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew
religion and the universalist project of Judaism.
Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work
toward the emergence of a world at 1peace,4 a peace meant to be universal and
permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word 1peace4 (shalom in
Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect
world that they are building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations.
This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition
of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a
global empire of 1peace.4 The very existence of separate nations is considered
to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be
weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a 1one world
government,4 a 1New World Order,4 one single world-ruling authority that will
permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.
We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of certain
intellectual marxists such as Karl Marx himself and the Jewish-French
philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the discourse of liberal thinkers such as
Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and France’s Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the
world by all means necessary and to generate cultural conflicts that will weaken
nation-states. It is for this One World that intellectuals Jews labor tirelessly all
over the world. Whether they call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or
marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the
pluralistic society and of universal miscegenation, that is of racial mixture.
Thus, all their strength the Jews U basically, ALL the vocal Jews in the
world U encourage non-white immigration into every country in which they are
located, not only because the multicultural society is their fundamental political
aim, but also because the disintegration of national identity in each nation and
the massive presence of anti-white immigrants is designed to prevent the
original white population from succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against
the Jewish sway over finance, politics and the media. All Jewish intellectuals,
without any exception, are focused on this question of building the 1pluralistic
society4 and for this they practice constant 1vigilance against racism.4 In
France, influential writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques
Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and
anti-racism despite their political divergences in other areas. This obsession,
which is very characteristic of Judaism, is also manifested in movies, where
many producers and directors are influential Jews. As soon as a film starts
defending and promoting interbreeding, 1tolerance4 and pluralism, we can be
sure that the producer of it is Jewish.
Now we can understand better why the former communists and leftists of
the 1970s did not have to make such a big leap to become today’s 1neoconservatives.4
They have merely switched to a different strategy to achieve the
same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews over a racially mixed society.
The fact is that after the Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the
Jews in France and the rest of the Western world have realized that nowadays
the danger to their interests and their project comes primarily from Islam and
from young African immigrants, both Arabic and black. Their aim is to
strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending society, which they have
contributed so much to establish in our country of France. But this mosaic now
threatens to break up into separate communities, and this the Jews do not want.
They want no separate identities or separateness at all, except a separate Jewish
identity and Jewish separateness. Former marxists in France such as Alexandre
Adler, André Glucksmann and Pascal Bruckner thus support nowadays, along
with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing, pro-Washington, pro-zionist party of
Nicolas Sarkozy. And yet they have not become French patriots. They react
only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry, asking, as American Jews proverbially
do on every issue: 1Is it good for the Jews ?4
The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytizing people on earth,
but unlike Christians or Muslims, who dream of converting all peoples of all
races to their faith, the Jews have no plan to convert the world to their own
faith, Judaism, but simply to encourage other nationalities to give up their
national and religious identities U and live only for the goal of 1tolerance.4 The
unceasing campaigns to blame all Whites for slavery, colonialism, the
plundering of the Third World or for Auschwitz have no other purpose than
putting the opponent on the defensive, and getting him on his knees not by
violence but via guilt. When the Jews are the only people left on earth who are
keeping their faith and their traditions, they will finally be recognized by
everyone as God`s 1chosen people.4
Their 1mission4 (and Jews frequently use this term 1mission4) is to disarm
the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewishcontrolled,
to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free
work force, and thus to favor a universal 1peace4 among the peoples who have
no more 1divisive4 identities.
As their prophet Isaiah said: 1The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger
will rest with the kid, the lion and the ram shall live together, and a young child
will lead them4 (Isaiah 11: 6-9). The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited
for three thousands years, will establish anew the kingdom of David and will
give the Jews an empire over all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly
call for this.
Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign, in whatever
society they inhabit, in order to promote the unification of the world U and thus
to also hasten the arrival of their promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda
is a Jewish specialty, and it is no coincidence that Jews become so influential in
all the media. In their hands, the concepts of 1tolerance4 and 1human rights4
have become incredibly efficient weapons of white guilt and accusation against
the majority culture. In fact, it is not through Jewish-sounding names or a
Jewish physical appearance that we can best recognize Jews, but rather from
what they write and say wherever they are on earth.
Many Jews, as we know, played an absolutely
writings, for example in an editorial in Israel magazine of April 2003, 1the first
Israeli monthly magazine in the French language4 written under the name of a
certain André Darmon.
He wrote: 1To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are
exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.4
No less!
With this mindset of absolute innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any
responsibility for their atrocities. Jews are only victims, only 1scapegoats4 in an
evil and hostile world. But very soon the Messiah will punish the 1wicked4 and
will restore the victimized sons of Israel to their full rights.
Nevertheless, in this same Israel Magazine editorial, a certain Frederick
Stroussi asserted that the Nazi government was worse than the Stalin regime.
He quoted the cruelties he claimed were perpetrated by certain SS men. For
example, we learn from Stroussi that the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to
toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in skeet shooting. He
also writes of other episodes, such as the rape of children by the SS before they
killed them. The Second World War has certainly stimulated the fertile
imagination of the children of Israel.
Or perhaps this imagination is once again a case of the Jews’ own
1projection4 syndrome, that is, accusing others systematically of one’s very own
crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy: always attack. We know in fact —
even if the media never speak about it — that many Jews and their rabbis are
involved in the felony crime of pedophilia (see Psychanalyse du Judaisme,
And murdering a child would seem to be more a Jewish specialty than a
characteristic of the SS mind. The revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff
of Bar Eilan University in Israel — the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome
U and buttressed in February 2007 by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly
work Pasqua di Sangue [ = 1Blood Passover] U reveals proof of ritual murder
among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of Eastern European origin).
We outsiders are thus supposed to understand that the sufferings of Jews
cannot be compared to those of any others. As a consequence, we are supposed
to get as indignant as they do when a serious historian such as Stephane
Courtois states (in the preface of his famous Black Book of Communism): 1The
death of a Ukrainian child of Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class]
who is deliberately forced to starve to death by the Stalinist government is as
significant as the death of a Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.4 These simple
words were enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was
1stunned4 by such an affront. Such a remark, according to him, was
1despicable4 and represented a vulgar attack against Israel: 1What does this
comparison have to do here?4 he writes. 1Why do we have to use the slaughter
of a Jewish child to transmit this underlying, false and hateful rumor that the
Jews overshadow all other victims of totalitarianism and monopolize all the
attention on themselves?4
The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outraged and totally
disproportionate way to the modest and certainly justified intentions of the
level-headed historian Stephane Courtois. Stroussi demonstrates here the 1great
intolerance to the frustration4 which are so characteristic of the Jewish
intellectual. Such reactions are clearly not 1normal.4
We note that Israel Magazine is a monthly magazine designed for the
Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick
Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or hiding from the goyeem the true nature of
bolshevism and the supposedly malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here
does not correspond to any false dialectic, as antisemites claim, but here, in this
magazine by and for Jews, he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to
Jews, the very essence of their soul: 1) We are always innocent U and 2) Jewish
lives are more valuable than those of others.
There is an 1attack antisemitism4 that stems from a failure to understand
the Jewish identity and only sees deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a
genuine existential anxiety, one generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.
The Jews have never dared to collectively approach the mirror on their
inner lives represented by Freudian psychoanalysis, a prism through which the
Jews claim to see all humanity, but which, at a closer analysis, sheds far more
light on the specific neuroses of Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like marxism, is a
1Jewish science4 and a product of the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to
wonder how this Freudian 1discovery4 corresponds to Jewish specificities.
The answer was not initially obvious to the author and it took the reading
and analysis of hundreds of books of all kinds, mostly written by Jews
themselves, for him to realize that the searing question of incest stands at the
throbbing heart of the Jewish question, and not theoretically either.
Jewish mothers do love their sons, as is well known, but outright incest is at
the origin of a well-known mental illness U one that especially afflicts Jews U
called 1hysteria.4 Incest attracted early the attentions of Freud while he was
developing his theories. The parallels between Judaism and hysterical
pathology are quite natural.
Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression,
introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity,
prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity and so on. Every Jewish symptom is
found in hysteria.
Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely projected the traits of a specific community
onto the rest of humanity. In reality, there is no 1Oedipus complex4 but rather
an Israel complex (all Jews together technically being Israel, not just the Near
Eastern state). In fact, Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic of
incest within their families. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention:
1The hysterical woman so much wants a child from her father or her doctor that
she can persuade herself that she is pregnant by one of them and thus develops
a ‘nervous pregnancy.’4
It is interesting that all Jewish writers use the same term to refer to the
coming of their Messiah, namely, the 1delivery4 of the Messiah. The whole
Jewish community, we must understand, is 1the wife of God4 (the Shekhina of
the Kabbalist) who is some day supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus
the whole of Jewry is indeed suffering from a 1nervous pregnancy4 not unlike
that found in nervous, hysterical women.
Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud,
wrote sarcastically: 1Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to
be the cure4. But the right and the best formula can be stated in ten words:
1Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is meant to cure.4
After Freud, other Jewish thinkers came along who produced a symbiosis
between Freudian doctrine and marxism. Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse
preached sexual revolution in order to break down the patriarchal family and
unleash 1free sex.4 Their theories largely inspired the student riots of May 68.
The 1970s saw a new wave of freudomarxism and Jewish women were in the
forefront (such as Gisele Halimi and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella
Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem in the USA). As time passed, a series
of Jewish-inspired laws appeared, one after the other, designed to dissolve the
family. In France, a Neuwirth-promoted law legalized the contraceptive pill
(1967), then came the challenge to the authority of the father as head of the
household (1970), then divorce by mutual consent (1974) and the 1right4 to
abortion promoted by 1Holocaust survivor4 Simone Veil (1975). A great wave
of movie porn accompanied this 1liberation4 from traditional family values.
Here we are compelled to note that Jewish producers and film directors play a
very important role in the sex film industry. (See my La Mafia Juive [ = 1The
Jewish Mafia4], 400 pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of
bisexuality favored the acceptance of overt 1gay pride4 and homosexuality.
In fact, the only tangible results of this moral 1liberation4 was the
systematic demoralization and criminalization of the white man, who is
denounced tirelessly in movies, literature and history as the cause of all the
planet’s ills and of the collapse of the West. The appeal of egalitarianism –as
intended by Jewry U tends to level all ethnic differences and identities and
brings about their slow destruction.
Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem
Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel
“Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of
this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all
Jewry worldwide, not just 1the State of Israel4] and the rest of humanity… as
absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close
combat between Israel and the Nations U and it can only be genocidal and total
because it is about our and their identities.”
You read it right : Between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity the
struggle can only be “genocidal and total.” The “peace” which Israel intends to
confer is no more and no less than 1genocide,4 the warrant for the execution of
all humanity U except for those allowed to live as cultureless slaves.
The question is whether the aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in
order to save humanity from its evils, evils that could prove even more serious
than marxism such as psychoanalysis and the ideology of globalism. First of all,
we must face the facts: 1After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding,
the antisemitic Christians, the Muslims and Hitler have all failed to resolve the
Jewish question. The fact is that the Jews feed on and grow off the hatred they
have engendered among all the peoples of this world. This hatred, it must be
said, is vital for their survival and for their spiritual genetics. It has allowed
them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an
external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.
For their part, the rabbis spare no efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish.
And so even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless
to attempt to leave the Jewish prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison.
Claiming that a Jew cannot ever stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s
Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the
Jews are not 1perfidious4 people as much as they are sick people to be cured.
Jews are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from
the prison in which they are locked. Only then will they become free from the
cult’s grip U and from the threat they pose to themselves and to all humanity.
Only then we will become free from this grip, and at the same time, they
will free themselves from the evil inside them that threatens all mankind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *